Advanced Math Unit M2

Quadratic Expressions & Factoring

Trinomials cracked by the pair hunt, differences of squares, and the square you complete by literally building one.

Every trinomial hides a pair of numbers waiting to be found — and the hunt for them opens every factoring door, up to completing an actual square.

The reverse gear meets its first real hill

M1 ended with a promise: expanding has a reverse gear. You used it there to undo a monomial — spot the shared 2x2x in 6x2+10x6x^2 + 10x and pull it out front. Now look at x2+5x+6x^2 + 5x + 6. Check its terms for a common factor: the coefficients 11, 55, 66 share nothing, and the 66 carries no xx. The GCF move comes up empty — yet this expression is a product, (x+2)(x+3)(x+2)(x+3), wearing its expanded costume. The SAT loves this disguise, and the whole story of quadratic equations (that’s M3, one unit ahead) turns on being able to strip it off. So: given the offspring, how do you find the parents?

Interrogate the product

You know from M1 exactly what expanding two parentheses does. Run it on (x+m)(x+n)(x+m)(x+n) with the letters left in:

Read it like a detective. Whatever mm and nn were, the expanded costume reports on them: the constant term is their product, and the middle coefficient is their sum. The two numbers aren’t gone — they’re sitting in plain sight, encoded. So factoring x2+5x+6x^2 + 5x + 6 is a hunt with two clues:

the target
Find two numbers that multiply to 66 and add to 55.
the hunt
You’ve listed factor pairs since F2. Pairs of 66:   16\;1 \cdot 6 \to sum 77. No.   23\;2 \cdot 3 \to sum 55. There.
write it
The pair drops straight into the parentheses: x2+5x+6=(x+2)(x+3)x^2 + 5x + 6 = (x+2)(x+3).
check
Expand it back — the middle terms give 3x+2x=5x3x + 2x = 5x ✓. Same expression, different costume, exactly M1’s test.

Watch the hunt happen at the board first — one wrong pair crossed out and all:

Press play — the board writes itself.

0:00 / 1:51
Transcript

Here’s one the test absolutely loves. x squared, plus five x, plus six. You already know how to build this — multiply two parentheses, expand. Now the question flips: can you un-build it? Watch.

Don’t guess — interrogate it. That six at the end? It’s the two mystery numbers, multiplied together. And the five in the middle? The very same two numbers, added. Two clues, one pair.

So — pairs of six. First try: one and six. Multiply them — six, good. But add them… seven. We needed five, so that pair is out. Cross it off.

Wipe it — next candidate: two and three. Multiply — six. Add… five. There it is. That’s our pair.

And the payoff — the pair drops straight into the parentheses: x plus two, times x plus three. That’s the factored form, right there.

Don’t trust it — check it. x times x gives x squared. The middle pieces — two x plus three x — five x. And two times three, six. Exactly where we started. Now it’s not a guess; it’s a fact.

That’s the whole game. A trinomial never hides its parents: the end is their product, the middle is their sum. Hunt the pair — and the parentheses write themselves.

The pair hunt · 1:51

Now hunt yourself — the slider walks every pair of cc, and you watch the sum needle:

x² +x +
-62

need 5

The product is pinned — keep sliding until the sum lands.

The factor hunt, live

Predict before you slide: load the x28x+12x^2 - 8x + 12 preset. The product is positive 1212, the sum is negative 88 — so should the pair be two positives, two negatives, or one of each? Decide, then sweep and see where the needle lands. Then load x2+x12x^2 + x - 12: the product went negative, and now the pair must straddle zero — feel how much smaller the sums get when the two numbers fight instead of team up. That’s the sign compass, and your hands just learned it: cc positive → both numbers wear bb‘s sign; cc negative → opposite signs, and the bigger number takes bb‘s.

One more, important precisely because it fails: load x2+3x+1x^2 + 3x + 1 and sweep the whole track. Nothing multiplies to 11 and adds to 33. That’s not you failing — that trinomial genuinely doesn’t factor over the integers, and on the SAT, recognizing a dead end fast is worth as much as factoring. (M3 gives you the tool that cracks even those.)

When the lead isn’t 1: send the hunt through a·c

2x2+7x+32x^2 + 7x + 3 breaks the pattern above — the lead coefficient 22 contaminates the simple sum–product reading. The fix is one extra stop: run the same hunt on ac=23=6a \cdot c = 2 \cdot 3 = 6, still adding to 77. That’s 11 and 66. They don’t drop into parentheses directly; instead they split the middle term, and M1’s grouping instinct finishes it:

2x2+7x+3=2x2+x+6x+3=x(2x+1)+3(2x+1)=(2x+1)(x+3)2x^2 + 7x + 3 = 2x^2 + x + 6x + 3 = x(2x+1) + 3(2x+1) = (2x+1)(x+3)

Read the third step twice — both halves handed you the same parenthesis, (2x+1)(2x+1). That’s not luck; it’s the guarantee the hunt bought you. If your two groups ever disagree, the pair is wrong (or a sign slipped) — the method audits itself.

The trinomial with a missing term

Factor x29x^2 - 9. Don’t reach for a new rule — run the hunt you already own: two numbers that multiply to 9-9 and add to… well, there’s no xx-term, so they add to 00. That forces the pair 33 and 3-3:

x29=(x3)(x+3)x^2 - 9 = (x-3)(x+3)

Expand it back and watch why the middle term vanished: 3x+3x=0-3x + 3x = 0. The pattern is worth knowing by name — a difference of squares, A2B2=(AB)(A+B)A^2 - B^2 = (A-B)(A+B) — because the SAT dresses it up in coefficients: 4x225=(2x5)(2x+5)4x^2 - 25 = (2x-5)(2x+5), both pieces perfect squares, a minus between. But it’s not a separate trick. It’s the hunt, in the special case where the pair is forced to be ±\pm twins.

Its evil twin is the trap: x2+9x^2 + 9, a sum of squares, does not factor at all — try the hunt: multiply to +9+9, add to 00 is impossible, since two numbers with a positive product are on the same side of zero and can’t cancel. If you catch yourself writing (x+3)2(x+3)^2 for either of these, expand it: (x+3)2=x2+6x+9(x+3)^2 = x^2 + 6x + 9. There’s a 6x6x in there that neither x29x^2 - 9 nor x2+9x^2 + 9 ever had. M1’s equivalence test settles it in one line.

Completing the square — the name is literal

Some quadratics refuse every hunt (x2+6x+2x^2 + 6x + 2: multiply to 22, add to 66 — nothing). For those, algebra has a move so geometric its name is a construction manual. Take x2+6xx^2 + 6x and draw it: an xx-by-xx square, plus a 66-wide strip of xx-height standing beside it. Now cut the strip in half — two slabs of 3x3x — and wrap one around the corner. What you’ve built is almost a bigger square, (x+3)(x+3) on each side… except the corner has a hole in it. A 3×33 \times 3 hole. Exactly 99.

Watch the square get built — and the classic trap get crossed out:

Press play — the board writes itself.

0:00 / 2:01
Transcript

Now for the boss move. x squared, plus six x, plus two. Go ahead, try the hunt: two numbers that multiply to two and add to six… there’s nothing. This one needs the tool with the most honest name in all of algebra: completing the square.

Here’s the secret — stop reading x squared as symbols, and draw it. x squared is literally a square: x wide, x tall. There it is.

[an x-by-x square, labeled x squared]

[x]

[x]

[x²]

Now the six x. Split it into three x plus three x — and give the square one strip on the right, and one along the bottom. Same area, just rearranged.

[two 3-wide strips of x-area, one on the square’s right edge, one along its bottom]

[two 3-wide strips of x-area, one on the square’s right edge, one along its bottom]

And look at what we’ve almost made. One big square — x plus three, on each side. Almost… see that bite in the corner? Three by three. A missing nine.

[the missing 3-by-3 corner, outlined and labeled 9]

[9]

So the picture just proved something: x squared plus six x is the big square — x plus three, squared — minus that missing nine. That’s geometry doing our algebra.

Now the classic trap. We still owe the plus two, so you might just bolt it on: x plus three squared, plus two. Looks finished, right? But expand that square — it carries a plus nine nobody gave us. Off it goes.

The honest version: big square, pay back the nine, then add the two we actually had. And minus nine plus two… minus seven. There it is — x plus three squared, minus seven.

So when the hunt comes up dry, build the square. Half the middle number — that’s your corner. Square it — that’s the debt. Pay it back, and the expression tells the truth. Completing the square: the name was the instructions all along.

Completing the square, literally · 2:01
x² +x +
x33x33x3x9
fold

— drag the fold: the strip splits in half and wraps the corner

half, then squareTake half of the -coefficient — half of is (keep the sign) — and square it: . That's the number a perfect square needs.
add and subtract itAdd it AND subtract it — net zero, so nothing changes: .
bundle the squareThe first three terms are exactly — that was the whole point. Now: .
combine constantsThe leftovers merge: .
result.
checkExpand it back: ✓ — same expression in square clothing.
Build the square yourself

Drag the fold slowly and watch the hole open. That hole is the whole method: the pieces you HAVE (x2+6xx^2 + 6x) are a completed square minus its corner patch:

x2+6x=(x+3)29x^2 + 6x = (x+3)^2 - 9

So x2+6x+2x^2 + 6x + 2 — the one the hunt couldn’t touch — surrenders to arithmetic: it’s (x+3)29+2=(x+3)27(x+3)^2 - 9 + 2 = (x+3)^2 - 7. The recipe your hands just learned: half of bb (that’s why the strip splits — only halves wrap evenly), square it (the corner patch), add it and subtract it (patch the hole, pay for the patch).

Predict before you drag: load the x2+10x+25x^2 + 10x + 25 preset. The strip is 1010 wide — how wide is each wrapped half, and how big will the corner hole be? Now drag — and notice the +25+25 you brought along pays for the hole exactly. That’s what “perfect square trinomial” means: x2+10x+25=(x+5)2x^2 + 10x + 25 = (x+5)^2, no leftovers. Then try x2+5x+3x^2 + 5x + 3: an odd strip still folds, the halves are just 52\tfrac{5}{2} wide — fractions are the method working, not the method breaking.

One warning, because this is where points die: the sign of half rides along. For x28x+5x^2 - 8x + 5, half of 8-8 is 4-4, so the square is (x4)2(x-4)^2 — and the patch is (4)2=16(-4)^2 = 16, positive. Square the half after keeping its sign, and never forget the “subtract” half of add-and-subtract: (x4)2(x-4)^2 alone claims a +16+16 you were never given.

The one thing to remember

Every factoring move in this unit is the expansion formula read backwards. The trinomial reports the pair’s sum and product — hunt it. No pair? Check for two squares and a minus. Still nothing? Complete the square: half of bb, squared, added and subtracted — and if you forget why, fold the strip and look at the hole.

The three patterns

SeeDoExample
x2+bx+cx^2 + bx + chunt the pair: multiply to cc, add to bbx2+5x+6=(x+2)(x+3)x^2 + 5x + 6 = (x+2)(x+3)
ax2+bx+cax^2 + bx + chunt on aca \cdot c, split the middle, group2x2+7x+3=(2x+1)(x+3)2x^2 + 7x + 3 = (2x+1)(x+3)
A2B2A^2 - B^2sum times difference4x225=(2x5)(2x+5)4x^2 - 25 = (2x-5)(2x+5)

The sign compass for the hunt: c>0c > 0 → both numbers wear bb‘s sign. c<0c < 0 → opposite signs, the bigger number takes bb‘s. No pair works → it doesn’t factor over the integers.

Completing the square (x2+bx+cx^2 + bx + c): half of bb (keep the sign) → square it → add AND subtract it → bundle: (x+b2)2+(cb24)\left(x + \tfrac{b}{2}\right)^2 + \left(c - \tfrac{b^2}{4}\right).

Perfect square trinomial: x2±2vx+v2=(x±v)2x^2 \pm 2vx + v^2 = (x \pm v)^2 — the constant is a square AND the middle is twice its root. Both checks, always.

x² +x +
-62

need 5

The product is pinned — keep sliding until the sum lands.

x² +x +
x33x33x3x9
fold

— drag the fold: the strip splits in half and wraps the corner

half, then squareTake half of the -coefficient — half of is (keep the sign) — and square it: . That's the number a perfect square needs.
add and subtract itAdd it AND subtract it — net zero, so nothing changes: .
bundle the squareThe first three terms are exactly — that was the whole point. Now: .
combine constantsThe leftovers merge: .
result.
checkExpand it back: ✓ — same expression in square clothing.
The equation is true for every . What is ?

Expand the product and read the x-coefficient off the result.

Correct: 0Attempts: 0Streak: 0Best: 0