Advanced Math Unit M7

Polynomial & Rational Expressions

Dividing polynomials, the remainder shortcut, and fractions built from polynomials — including the points they are never allowed to touch.

Polynomials divide like numbers do — remainder included — and when they stack into fractions, the bottom's zeros become points the graph can never touch.

The one operation polynomials were still missing

Divide 1717 by 55 and you get 33 with 22 left over. Before moving on, notice what that sentence really claims: 17=53+217 = 5 \cdot 3 + 2. Division-with-remainder is a fact about multiplication — the divisor times the quotient, plus a leftover too small to divide again. You can add, subtract, and multiply polynomials already (that’s what makes an expression like 6x2+5x46x^2 + 5x - 4 yours to rearrange — M1’s whole game). Division is the gear that was missing, and it works exactly like the 1717 and the 55:

divide the leads
What is 6x2+5x42x+3\dfrac{6x^2 + 5x - 4}{2x + 3}? Attack the leading terms: 6x2÷2x=3x6x^2 \div 2x = 3x. That’s the first piece of the quotient.
multiply back, subtract
3x(2x+3)=6x2+9x3x(2x+3) = 6x^2 + 9x. Subtract it: 6x2+5x4(6x2+9x)=4x46x^2 + 5x - 4 - (6x^2 + 9x) = -4x - 4.
repeat
Leads again: 4x÷2x=2-4x \div 2x = -2. And 2(2x+3)=4x6-2(2x+3) = -4x - 6, so subtracting leaves (4x4)(4x6)=2(-4x - 4) - (-4x - 6) = 2.
stop
A lone 22 has smaller degree than 2x+32x + 3 — nothing more divides. Quotient 3x23x - 2, remainder 22.

Written back as multiplication, just like the numbers:

That second shape is worth staring at, because the SAT loves it: “which of the following is equivalent to 6x2+5x42x+3\frac{6x^2+5x-4}{2x+3}?” is this division in costume. The fraction of the leftover over the divisor is the tell.

The shortcut hiding in the identity

Now divide by something simpler — a monic xax - a — and look at the identity with a detective’s eye:

The remainder rr is a constant (it must have smaller degree than xax - a). And this equation holds for every xx — including x=ax = a. Set it there and watch the first piece die: (aa)q(a)=0(a - a)\,q(a) = 0, leaving p(a)=rp(a) = r. Read that again: the remainder is just the value of the polynomial at aa. No division required. Take p(x)=x32x25x+6p(x) = x^3 - 2x^2 - 5x + 6 divided by x2x - 2:

p(2)=(2)32(2)25(2)+6=8810+6=4p(2) = (2)^3 - 2(2)^2 - 5(2) + 6 = 8 - 8 - 10 + 6 = -4

One plug-in, and you know a whole long division’s leftover: remainder 4-4. That is the remainder theorem, and on the SAT it is a speed weapon — the question says “divided by”, the solve is a substitution.

Remainder Dial makes the theorem physical: the remainder is a height.

Divide by and watch the leftover. Drag the divisor dot along the -axis: the bar at is the remainder — it is exactly the height of the curve there, . No division required to know it.

try
-6-6-4-4-2-2224466a
dividing
remainder -4

The division leaves over — and the curve sits at height above (or below) . Same number, always: that is the remainder theorem.

The remainder is the height of the curve

The dial opens exactly at the division above — the cubic, divided at a=2a = 2, bar at 4-4. Predict before you drag: the curve seems to cross the axis near x=3x = 3. If it really does, what must the remainder of dividing by x3x - 3 be? Drag the dot there and watch the bar. Then hunt the other two crossings (x=1x = 1 and x=2x = -2), and finally load never lands: that curve refuses to touch the axis, so no integer aa kills the remainder — pp has no factor of the form xax - a at all.

A zero remainder is a certificate

What you just felt has a name. If p(a)=0p(a) = 0, the remainder of dividing by xax - a is zero — the division comes out exact, so xax - a is a factor of p(x)p(x), and the graph crosses the axis at aa. Three statements, one fact. The SAT’s favorite dress for it is a table:

xx1-11144
p(x)p(x)66006-6

“Which of the following must be a factor of pp?” The table whispers it: p(1)=0p(1) = 0, so x1x - 1 divides in exactly. Watch the sign — a zero at x=4x = -4 certifies the factor x(4)=x+4x - (-4) = x + 4. Plus inside, for a zero on the negative side.

Fractions made of polynomials

Numbers reduce by shared factors: 68\dfrac{6}{8} is 2324\dfrac{2 \cdot 3}{2 \cdot 4}, the 22s cancel, 34\dfrac{3}{4} remains. A rational expression is a fraction whose top and bottom are polynomials, and it plays by the same rule — with one extra law the numbers never needed. Here is the SAT’s usual costume:

factor top and bottom
x2x6x24\dfrac{x^2 - x - 6}{x^2 - 4}: the hunt (that’s M2’s skill — two numbers multiplying to 6-6, adding to 1-1) gives (x3)(x+2)(x2)(x+2)\dfrac{(x-3)(x+2)}{(x-2)(x+2)}.
read the bans first
Before anything cancels: the bottom is 00 at x=2x = 2 and x=2x = -2. A fraction with a zero denominator is not a number — both values are off-limits, and they stay off-limits no matter what happens next.
cancel the shared factor
Top and bottom share the whole factor (x+2)(x+2). Dividing both by it changes nothing — for every allowed xx: (x3)(x+2)(x2)(x+2)=x3x2\dfrac{(x-3)(x+2)}{(x-2)(x+2)} = \dfrac{x-3}{x-2}.
result
x3x2\dfrac{x-3}{x-2}, with x2x \ne 2 and x2x \ne -2 still banned.

The points that stay banned — walls and pinholes

Both banned values are undefined, but they fail in two very different ways, and the SAT asks about the difference. At x=2x = 2 the reduced bottom x2x - 2 still dies: right next to 22, the top sits near 1-1 while the bottom is tiny — and a nonzero number divided by a tiny number is enormous. The graph shoots up a vertical asymptote: a wall it climbs forever and never touches. At x=2x = -2 the guilty factor cancelled — nearby, the expression behaves exactly like x3x2\frac{x-3}{x-2}, calmly approaching 54=54\frac{-5}{-4} = \frac{5}{4}. The graph is a smooth curve with a single point missing: a hole. Cancelling removed the wall. It did not remove the ban.

Build a fraction out of factors — tap them on and off in the top and bottom rows. A bottom factor with no partner on top raises a dashed wall; a factor on both cancels, leaving only a pinhole. Then drag the probe along the axis and read the values.

top
bottom
-6-6-4-4-2-2224466probe

Top and bottom share — it cancels. But cancelling only changes the formula, never the ban: the original still divides by there.

banned:

wall at x = 2pinhole at x = -2

at the value is

Walls, pinholes, and a probe to feel them

It opens on the exact fraction above. Predict before you touch: which banned xx has the dashed wall, and which the open circle? Now tap the top row’s (x+2)(x+2) off — the bottom’s (x+2)(x+2) just lost its cancelling partner, so what must replace the pinhole at x=2x = -2? Check, then tap it back on and drag the probe from x=1x = 1 toward the wall at 22 and read the values: the strip keeps halving your distance, and the values keep roughly doubling — no ceiling. Park the probe near the pinhole instead and the same strip calmly settles toward 54\frac{5}{4}. Blow-up versus settle: your hands now know the difference the vocabulary is naming.

The one thing to remember

Division leaves a fingerprint: p(x)=(xa)q(x)+rp(x) = (x-a)\,q(x) + r, and setting x=ax = a reads the fingerprint without dividing — r=p(a)r = p(a), with r=0r = 0 certifying a factor. Fractions of polynomials reduce like fractions of numbers — by whole factors only — and the denominator’s zeros are banned before the cancelling starts: a surviving factor below is a wall, a cancelled one leaves a pinhole.

Division and its two theorems

Long division: divide the leading terms → multiply back → subtract → repeat. The SAT’s “equivalent expression” form: pd=q+rd\dfrac{p}{d} = q + \dfrac{r}{d}.

TheoremStatementUse it when
Remainderp÷(xa)p \div (x-a) leaves r=p(a)r = p(a)“…the remainder is” → just plug in aa
Factorp(a)=0    (xa)p(a) = 0 \iff (x-a) is a factortables with a zero row; “which must be a factor”

Sign check: a zero at x=4x = -4 gives the factor x+4x + 4. Zero negative, sign inside positive.

Rational expressions

Simplify: factor top and bottom → note every xx that zeroes the bottom → cancel whole shared factors → keep the bans.

Undefined: exactly where the denominator is 00including factors that cancel.

At a banned xxThe factor below…The graph shows
Vertical asymptotesurvives the cancelvalues blow up beside a dashed wall
Holecancels away completelya smooth curve with one missing point

At a hole, the missing value is the reduced expression evaluated there.

Divide by and watch the leftover. Drag the divisor dot along the -axis: the bar at is the remainder — it is exactly the height of the curve there, . No division required to know it.

try
-6-6-4-4-2-2224466a
dividing
remainder -4

The division leaves over — and the curve sits at height above (or below) . Same number, always: that is the remainder theorem.

Build a fraction out of factors — tap them on and off in the top and bottom rows. A bottom factor with no partner on top raises a dashed wall; a factor on both cancels, leaving only a pinhole. Then drag the probe along the axis and read the values.

top
bottom
-6-6-4-4-2-2224466probe

Top and bottom share — it cancels. But cancelling only changes the formula, never the ban: the original still divides by there.

banned:

wall at x = 2pinhole at x = -2

at the value is

Simplify as far as it goes.

Factor top and bottom, then cancel whole shared FACTORS — single terms never cancel.

Correct: 0Attempts: 0Streak: 0Best: 0